Skip to main content

Response to 'Over' by Jörn Threlfall

In 2015, Jörn Threlfall directed a crime/mystery short film called 'Over'. It ultimately tells the true and tragic story of a man from Angola who fell to his death from a British Airways flight as it arrived in London. The man had been hiding in the plane's 'wheel-well' and fell out when the landing gear was lowered, by which point his body was almost frozen. Threlfall uses an unconventional narrative to tell this story; as the events, labelled with various times, unfold backwards, allowing the viewer upon their first viewing, to play detective and work out the mystery themselves.

Image result for over jorn threlfall

When I began to watch this film, I thought the use of very long takes of minimal action were boring, but upon reflection, I realise that once you understand the storyline, the fact that not much is happening is the point; this is the aftermath of the man's death, yet there seems to barely be any effect on the community. I think this narrative is very effective, and a new and interesting way to tell a tragic story caused by the immigration crisis. It says a lot about Britain's stance on this topic, especially within a middle-class neighbourhood where the film is set, as people tend to become desensitised to death that they can't relate to, but by telling the story backwards, Threlfall ensures the film ends in shock, and leaves the audience thinking for a while afterwards.

Micro-elements in this film are also very effective; Threlfall ensures complete realism by using only diegetic sound, and with static and distant shots, giving the viewer the POV of an observer. Integrated within these shots are sudden close-ups of the action, and still images of evidence, which upon a second viewing seem particularly shocking, especially the close-up of the hose, washing away the man's blood.

Strangely, a short film I recommended on this blog in June, before I knew the short films would be studying (Home), is also a British short film of around 25 mins, about the refugee crisis, and the narrative once again told backwards. The film, by Daniel Mulloy, delivers the same message as 'Over', but despite this, the films are still completely different in terms of the events occurring, the characters and the micro-elements.

In terms of 'Home' influencing my own work, I am a fan of the unconventional narrative, as this really makes the viewer think, but though it is perfect for this particular narrative, I think this would be hard to pull off with a different story, and I'd have to think carefully about what I would want my film to be about.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Response to 'The Arrival' by Daniel Montanarini

In 2016, Daniel Montanarini directed a short film called 'Arrival' which follows a pregnant woman's inner monologue as she waits in a cafe to tell the man this news. She debates in her head whether or not to keep it, eventually coming to a decision at the end of the film, just before the man arrives. This film is, overall, theatrical. It consists entirely of the expressions of the woman (Anna) and her inner monologue conveyed with a voice-over. It is like the cafe is her stage, as everything from the spotlight on the lead actress to the over-the-top expressions to the well blocked extras in the background exudes drama. Montanarini's camerawork is effective. He uses a simple zoom-in as the scene progresses, building to the climax of the film which is a train going past the window as Anna reaches her decision (whether this is literal or metaphorical or both  seems ambiguous). I think all of these features achieve what Montanarini was trying to which, as he said in an...

Response to 'Echo' by Lewis Arnold

In 2011, Lewis Arnold directed a short film called 'Echo'. It follows Caroline, a 17 year old girl, who gets a phone call informing her that her dad has been in an accident. However, as the film continues we learn that, though this event did happen, Caroline was pretending to get the call again to con people in the street into giving her money. The film is an interesting exploration of grief and the ways people deal with it, but the most interesting element, I feel, is the narrative structure. In an interview I watched, Arnold explains that the film was written in three parts; three phone calls, the first using long takes to be the most objective, and allows the audience to take the place of pedestrians on the street so that the scene remains ambiguous, to leave the viewer wondering what exactly is happening. Then, when the second phone call takes place, the audience enters the scene from the point of view of Caroline's younger brother. This makes it clear that no...

Building Character in Screenplays

There are three main details to include in a screenplay to develop a character: 1. The impression they create- their appearance; costume, makeup, actor, age 2. Their attitude- their personality and temperament 3. The world they inhabit- where and how they live; setting, props The most important element of a character is their personality, which is what you should develop first. To do this you could place them in scenarios and imagine their reaction. These may be unrelated to your narrative but might help you come up with ideas, or you could place them a scenario you already want to include in your screenplay, helping you to build a scene as well as a character. Some scenarios might be: - What would the character do if they were cheated on? - What would the character do if they were mugged? - Would your character accept a bribe and why? Other questions you could ask about your character to develop personality are: - Why are they interesting? - How does their personality...