Skip to main content

Narrative Structures in Film

In this blog post, I will be discussing research I have carried out surrounding narrative structures in film, specific theorists relating to this, and structures within short films specifically.

Three-Act Structure

The Three-Act Structure is an old principal used in all types of story telling. Essentially it means the story has a beginning, middle and end, though these are usually called:
  1. Setup
  2. Confrontation
  3. Resolution
3 act structure


Theorist #1- Todorov
Todorov identified traditional narrative theory by studying classic fairy tales and stories; he discovered that narratives move forward in chronological order with a clear beginning, middle and end, and suggested that characters are changed in someway at the end of the narrative. He called this a linear narrative.

Linear Narrative Steps:
  1. The narrative begins with an equilibrium
  2. An action or character disrupts this equilibrium
  3. A quest to restore the equilibrium begins
  4. The narrative continues to a climax
  5. A resolution occurs and equilibrium is restored

Unconventional Narratives
Non-linear narratives and circular narratives have a more complicated structure; a non-linear narrative can move backwards and forwards in time, often using a flashback device (e.g. 'The Ellington Kid' by Dan Sully), and a circular narrative might begin at the end of a story and work its way back to the origins of the narrative, meaning the audience may only understand the full story a the end of the film (e.g. 'Slap' by Nick Rowland).


Theorist #2- Propp
Propp discovered that narrative is driven by characters using a set of narrative functions, and did this by analysing Russian folk tales. He discovered 8 different types of character:

The Hero -protagonist- (has a quest/mission to complete)
The Villain -antagonist- (attempts to stop the hero from achieving their goal)
The Princess (the love interest/object of the quest)
The Father (a person with knowledge)
The Dispatcher (who sends the hero on their mission)
The Donor (who gives the hero help)
The Sidekick (who helps the hero; not as attractive/potentially comic relief)
The False Hero (a villain pretending to be good to deceive the real hero)


Theorist #3- Levi-Strauss
Levi-Strauss examined how narratives unconsciously reflect the norms/values, beliefs and myths of a culture. He states that these elements are usually expressed in the form of binary oppositions; a pair of related terms or concepts that have opposite meanings. For example: rich/poor, north/south, good/evil, black/white, young/old.


Theorist #4- Barthes
Barthes discovered that narrative in literature and film is a series of 5 codes that are read/interpreted by the audience.

Action (Proairetic) Code: Something the audience knows that doesn't need explaining, e.g. we assume a person on a stretcher is going to the hospital
Enigma (Hermeneutic) Code: Something hidden from the audience, creating mystery and intrigue
Semantic Code: Something the audience can figure out through connotations and implications
Symbolic Code: Something symbolising a more abstract concept that can create a greater meaning, tension, drama or character development
Cultural (Referential) Code: Something viewed with understanding due to an external body of cultural/historical/scientific knowledge e.g. younger people may understand word that older people can't


Narrative in Short Films
In short films specifically, the narrative structure becomes more of an issue, as the director has a limited amount of time to tell their story. Therefore, there are normally two ways narrative in a short film will go; the director will either stick to a simple three-act structure, or experiment with a more unconventional narrative, which is what the majority of the directors I have studied have done. I have also noticed that in almost all of these films, the directors have included a link from the beginning to the end, which successfully keeps the narrative contained and with a satisfying ending.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to 'The Arrival' by Daniel Montanarini

In 2016, Daniel Montanarini directed a short film called 'Arrival' which follows a pregnant woman's inner monologue as she waits in a cafe to tell the man this news. She debates in her head whether or not to keep it, eventually coming to a decision at the end of the film, just before the man arrives. This film is, overall, theatrical. It consists entirely of the expressions of the woman (Anna) and her inner monologue conveyed with a voice-over. It is like the cafe is her stage, as everything from the spotlight on the lead actress to the over-the-top expressions to the well blocked extras in the background exudes drama. Montanarini's camerawork is effective. He uses a simple zoom-in as the scene progresses, building to the climax of the film which is a train going past the window as Anna reaches her decision (whether this is literal or metaphorical or both  seems ambiguous). I think all of these features achieve what Montanarini was trying to which, as he said in an...

Response to 'Echo' by Lewis Arnold

In 2011, Lewis Arnold directed a short film called 'Echo'. It follows Caroline, a 17 year old girl, who gets a phone call informing her that her dad has been in an accident. However, as the film continues we learn that, though this event did happen, Caroline was pretending to get the call again to con people in the street into giving her money. The film is an interesting exploration of grief and the ways people deal with it, but the most interesting element, I feel, is the narrative structure. In an interview I watched, Arnold explains that the film was written in three parts; three phone calls, the first using long takes to be the most objective, and allows the audience to take the place of pedestrians on the street so that the scene remains ambiguous, to leave the viewer wondering what exactly is happening. Then, when the second phone call takes place, the audience enters the scene from the point of view of Caroline's younger brother. This makes it clear that no...

Building Character in Screenplays

There are three main details to include in a screenplay to develop a character: 1. The impression they create- their appearance; costume, makeup, actor, age 2. Their attitude- their personality and temperament 3. The world they inhabit- where and how they live; setting, props The most important element of a character is their personality, which is what you should develop first. To do this you could place them in scenarios and imagine their reaction. These may be unrelated to your narrative but might help you come up with ideas, or you could place them a scenario you already want to include in your screenplay, helping you to build a scene as well as a character. Some scenarios might be: - What would the character do if they were cheated on? - What would the character do if they were mugged? - Would your character accept a bribe and why? Other questions you could ask about your character to develop personality are: - Why are they interesting? - How does their personality...